Scala and Vim Part 1
I used IntelliJ for about a year, and that was around the time in mid 2019 when there was starting to be a bit more buzz around the new kid on the block: Metals. At the time, the docs had instructions about using Coursier to bootstrap Metals to be used with vim-lsc. There was a some setup necessary, but out of the box I was was able to get a good chunk of things working. While there was definitely room for improvement, this initial small win for me was enough to start getting more interested in the tooling around Scala and Vim, and it's when I first started slowly contributing to Metals.
Pretty soon after starting to contribute it was pretty evident that things like a simple automated installation process, an easy way to change configuration, or the ability to easily send commands to the server were necessary for wider adoption and just a nicety to have, especially if there was any desire to support some of the LSP extensions that Metals has. This naturally led to me wanting to create a plugin of sorts to aid in the install and generally make the setup easier. If you're familiar at all with the LSP and Vim world, you'll notice that there are a ton of options. At the time users were split between vim-lsc, vim-lsp, coc.nvim, deoplete, Ale, LanguageClient-neovim, and YouCompleteMe. The crazy part is, I'm probably forgetting some. There are a surprising amount of options for those looking for LSP support in Vim. I played around with a few of these, and to be honest, when I wanted to start the plugin, it would have been a toss up which I started with had it not been for the fact that coc.nvim provided a way to port over VS Code extensions to be used for Vim. Ultimately, if someone asks, why is the main Metals Vim plugin made for coc.nvim, the answer is because we can share a core with the VS Code plugin. You can even see this in the metals-languageclient library that Gabriele Petronella spearheaded that both coc-metals and metals-vscode use. The base of coc-metals was created pretty quickly thanks to how easy coc.nvim makes it to port over extensions. As things were coming together, I kept getting more excited, and I really wanted the experience for Vim Metals users to be both smooth and feature rich. I even made it a "resolution" for the new years, ha.
In the past 6 months there has been a ton of work done on coc-metals that I'm really proud of. With the help of multiple contributors every Metals LSP extension is supported and there is a seamless way to update your server version, restart the server, and continue to code, all without closing your buffer. With the latest release of coc-metals you can now debug, run, and test your code all within Vim (Nvim only at the moment) with the help of vimspector. You have a new project creator, worksheets that utilize virtual text (Nvim only), and if you want to use the Metals Tree View to explore the API of your dependencies, that's doable. It's great to see the full feature set of Metals supported in Vim if you choose to go the coc-metals route.
Looking back at the past 6 months, usage of coc.nvim has also skyrocketed. When I first started looking to making a coc plugin, the project had around 6k stars. Less than a year before that, they were less than 1k. Right now they are sitting around almost 12k stars on GitHub. coc.nvim is a success story. They put in the work, created an ecosystem of plugins, and capitalized on the ability of users to port popular language plugins from VS Code over to Vim.
I can't find the quote now, but a while back I read a comment on Reddit about the worry of coc.nvim taking over your terminal and basically becoming a coc.nvim editor powered by Vim. You can see inklings of this when you realize they have their own way to manage plugins, an ecosystem that heavily relies on Node, which is a bit out of the ordinary for a terminal based editor, and when you use coc.nvim, you sort of get locked into the coc.nvim way of doing things.
Overall, I'm very happy with coc-metals, and it's the way I recommend almost anyone to use Metals with Vim. However, there are some more recent things that get me excited and that I'll be shifting my focus and effort to this second half of the year.
I'm a happy neovim user, and I encourage anyone to take a look at the Vision and Goals of the project. Even with coc-metals, I think it greatly enhances your experience with the way it handles messages, offers virtual text which unlocks the decoration protocol, and just offers an overall smoother experience. Apart from that, one of the main things that get me excited is that the Nvim v.0.5.0 release will have built-in LSP support. This is ideal and the way Nvim is approaching LSP is to have a solid core that offers a myriad of extensibility without providing all the shiny bells and whistles out of the gate. Much of the integration is call-back based which allows users and plugin authors to define custom callbacks for basically all of the functionality that you'd want in your LSP experience. This has already worked great with the emergence of new plugins like completion-nvim and diagnostic-nvim which greatly enhance the Nvim LSP experience. The future for native LSP support in Nvim looks really bright in my opinion with plugins written in Lua and everything being easily extendable or swapped out, and that's the experience I'm looking for. It feels much closer to the mindset of Each Program Does One Thing Well like I mentioned above without one taking over your entire system. It was for this reason that I started nvim-metals which at the moment serves and an example of how to setup Metals with the native LSP support in Nvim, and also provides some extra functionality that you'll need at the moment. Keep in mind that this is all changing rapidly, stuff is breaking, and there is no stable for really any of this. However, I'm very excited about it, and I envision myself fully switching from coc-metals to nvim-metals in the next 6 months. It will take more work to set up, especially in its current state, but eventually I believe it will provide a faster, more stable, and more extensible Metals + Nvim experience.
I'd be amiss in this not to mention that Metals does a fantastic job of allowing editors of all kinds and all levels of support to have a solid editing experience. It's something I personally work hard at to ensure that whatever type of client is hooking up to Metals has a positive experience with the setup and configuration. It sort of goes unseen, but there is a lot of work that has gone into Metals to ensure that that all sorts of clients with all levels of support are taken care of. A few examples:
- Does the client support snippets in completions?
- Does the client have the ability to use virtual text or should it be given comments in worksheets?
- Does the client have the ability to show Doctor results, or should Metals take care of launching it in the browser for you? You can choose html or json for this.
- Plus many more...
It's because of this that an editor like Nvim with growing LSP support can still provide a great experience with Metals -- how well configuring the server works and also how open the team is to making necessary changes to ensure all editors are having a good experience. I couldn't be more proud to be part of the team.
I'd also like to touch a bit on the Vim and Scala ecosystem outside of Metals. I mentioned the vim-scala plugin earlier by Derek Wyatt. Every Scala developer that has used Vim to edit any Scala owes him a high five. The default syntax highlighting that actually ships with Vim is from that plugin. With that being said, I don't actually recommend usage of that plugin currently mainly because I think tooling in Scala has grown to a point where it offers everything that the plugin can do via Scalafmt or Scalafix. Organizing imports in an intelligent way was a huge piece of the missing puzzle for me as a Metals user until the recent scalafix-organize-imports rule by @liancheng was released. This is a godsend.
Another semi-related thing to this that excites me is the future of alternative syntax highlighting systems like tree-sitter. The great part is that a native tree-sitter module is also planed for the next major release of Nvim. I've recently been looking into the Scala grammar for tree-sitter, and I'm hopeful that the future holds the ability to use tree-sitter for syntax highlight for Scala in Nvim. I think this will be a game changer.
This article is radically incomplete since I know there are users out there that use Metals with some of the other Vim LSP clients, and maybe even some without any client and just plane old vanilla Vim. However, I wanted to give a bit of insight into the creation of coc-metals, the start of nvim-metals, and a bit of context to how I see the Scala and Vim experience. I hope to continually work at improving this, and hopefully by the end of the year I'll hear more people say, Scala support in Vim is fantastic. That's my goal anyways.
Cheers, and thanks for reading.